Ground for Contention
Controversy surrounds an article about Ground Zero
from The Atlantic Monthly
By Steve Ritea Ritea is a reporter for New
Orleans' Times-Picayune
Of all the September 11 heroes to emerge from the
ashes of the World Trade Center, New York City
firefighters are undoubtedly the most prominent.
Chronicling and emphasizing their valor has become such
a mainstay of post-9/11 coverage that many got a jolt
last fall when Atlantic Monthly correspondent William
Langewiesche wrote that firefighters and others working
on the cleanup "though ferociously dedicated to a grim
and dangerous task, were simply not involved in
heroics."
In the longest and one of the most attention-grabbing
pieces of original reporting The Atlantic has ever
run--now compiled into a book, "American
Ground"--Langewiesche (pronounced "Lang-a-veesha")
described "shadowy, widespread" looting at Ground Zero.
"Firemen were said to prefer watches from the Tourneau
store," he wrote on one page and, on the next, described
an excavated firetruck and how "its crew cab was filled
with dozens of new pairs of jeans from The Gap, a Trade
Center store." He added: "It was hard to avoid the
conclusion that the looting had begun even before the
first tower fell, and that while hundreds of doomed
firemen had climbed through the wounded buildings, this
particular crew had been engaged in something else
entirely, of course without the slightest suspicion that
the South Tower was about to hammer down."
People were livid. Roughly 150 firefighters and
widows of uniformed men who died in the wreckage
protested at a Langewiesche book-signing November 18 in
New York, chanting, "Liar! Liar!" One firefighter's
widow said the accusation was "disgusting" and
"tarnished the memory of everyone in that building that
died," according to New York papers. Threats of a
similar protest caused a Cambridge, Massachusetts,
bookstore to cancel a signing scheduled for a few days
later. A Web site lambasting Langewiesche for the claims
and other alleged errors also appeared. Altogether, it
gave a host of New York media columnists highly
emotional fodder and planted seeds of doubt about the
validity of Langewiesche's work.
The Atlantic issued a statement saying the magazine
stood "proudly" behind Langewiesche, a respected
journalist who won a National Magazine Award in May for
a piece on the crash of EgyptAir 990 and, for this
story, had unequaled unrestricted access to Ground Zero.
Toby Lester, the Atlantic's deputy managing editor, told
AJR that Langewiesche's self-described "frank and
even-keeled observations" naturally stirred emotions,
adding, "It would be a complete misreading of 'American
Ground' to believe that it denigrates the New York Fire
Department."
To focus on the watches and the jeans--a mere three
pages in a 205-page book--is to miss the point entirely,
Langewiesche wrote in a recent e-mail interview from his
home in France. The passage was included, he said, to
illustrate a fierce rivalry that existed between the
various groups working at the site.
In "American Ground," he wrote that the "hero" image
had seeped through the ranks of firefighters at Ground
Zero "like a low-grade narcotic." "[T]he firemen seemed
to become steadily more self-absorbed and isolated,"
causing "resentments...expressed in private
conversations on the pile." Construction workers who
unearthed the firetruck were in fact responsible for
spreading the story that firefighters had stolen the
jeans, he said, and jeered them upon the discovery. "The
very point of the jeans story," Langewiesche contends,
has "everything to do with the overreactions of the
construction workers on the pile and the growing
divisions between the various groups."
Atlantic editors and Langewiesche say the story was
vigorously fact-checked, but FDNY Deputy Assistant Chief
Ron Spadafora says no one ever checked out the story
with him or any other top department official. He also
says he has video of the truck, Ladder 4, being
unearthed, and it shows jeans strewn all over, not
neatly stacked and folded in the cab, as Langewiesche
wrote. The jeans were also from a Structure store, not
The Gap, Spadafora says.
Lester, of The Atlantic, says the fact-checkers were
not concerned with determining whether or not the jeans
were folded or whether they came from Structure or The
Gap. He says the fact-checkers "deliberately didn't want
to pin down, 'Was it Ladder 4?' " or other such details,
but rather they sought to confirm "that this story was
circulating"--and they did.
Even if Langewiesche was using the story to
illustrate a larger point, why not take steps to check
it out? That's the key question coming from
Langewiesche's most vocal critic, Rhonda Roland Shearer,
an expert on Dadaist art and the widow of Harvard
paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould. Though she openly
admits her journalism experience is "none," Shearer has
compiled an extensive list of "corrections" to "American
Ground" that alleges dozens of errors in addition to the
jeans passage.
Shearer, who helped raise more than $1 million to
assist with the cleanup at Ground Zero, has posted her
findings on a Web site, http://www.wtclivinghistory.org/,
that also serves as a homepage for her organization, The
WTC Living History Project. The group, which is made up
entirely of Ground Zero workers and Shearer, has one
mission--aside from attempting to garner a retraction
from The Atlantic. That mission, in Shearer's words, is
"to do a new type of journalism" based entirely on
firsthand accounts of people who were there, rather than
filtered through a reporter. "It's an experiment," she
says.
So far, her rally against "American Ground" has
failed to elicit much outrage, although she has gotten
the attention of Gary Hill, chairman of the Society of
Professional Journalists' Ethics Committee. "At this
point, we're just saying she's raised some serious
questions," says Hill, who adds that he has not checked
out any of Shearer's allegations and is just taking her
at her word. Whether his committee will actually look
into Shearer's claims was unclear in December. "So far,"
he says, "it hasn't raised that much discussion" within
the group.
In an October column for Slate headlined "Lay off
Langewiesche," Timothy Noah describes Shearer's
"corrections" as "highly emotional and largely
incoherent." Noah only discerned six errors in "American
Ground," all points he dismissed as "extremely minor."
In fact, the majority of Shearer's complaints center on
nebulous details (Langewiesche wrote that a firefighter
took medical leave because of a self-described "minor
heart attack," but she says the man did not actually
suffer a heart attack), disagreements over exact numbers
(he wrote that "as many as 250" firefighters were
unaccounted for in the wreckage; she says the correct
figure was 253) and--perhaps most commonly--semantic
disagreements.
In one section where Langewiesche describes firemen
venturing "like sightseers" into a subway tube, Shearer
responds: "The depiction of visual inspections of a
dangerous environment by trained and dedicated
firefighters as 'sightseers' is inaccurate and an
injustice to those who risk their lives in professional
service and in their extensive training."
Jay Rosen, chairman of New York University's
department of journalism, says no one doubts that
firefighters deserve untold thanks and praise, but
attacking Langewiesche for an open-eyed, honest account
of the cleanup at Ground Zero serves no good purpose.
After all, depicting realistic, three-dimensional people
is the most any journalist can hope to accomplish. "I
think that the defense of the firefighters, particularly
by Ms. Shearer, does a disservice to the people who
showed so much courage, by insisting on this portrait
that we intuitively know cannot be true," Rosen
says. |